Talk:Schrodinger Evaluator/@comment-28866669-20160628005444/@comment-86.170.105.95-20160628130323

Well, put it this way. there is a 60.7% chance of something good happening.

x = the amount of evaluators

the equation to work out the probability is pretty simple.

0.67 ^ x

So if you 10 evalutors, the probabily of gettings something good is 0.0182%

Adding evaluators results in an exponential growth, so you see, 12 evaluators has a probability of 0.00818%, much lower, but the with a higher potential of better value ore. And vice versa, using 8 evaluators increases the probability of something good by something almost 3 fold.

So its a judgement call and will require a lot of testing to be able to work out an optimal solution (I'm sure someone has somewhere, but I haven't checked), bare in mind it is based on probabliliy

I personnally would place 8/10, i wouldn't go higher than 12, the probability just becomes too small at that point.